Welcome!

Welcome, everyone, I am The Black Watcher. That does not refer to my skin colour, as I am in fact a white male from Scotland, but it does bare reference to my family army regiment 'The Black Watch'. As the word 'watcher' suggests, I am a fan of film and television...and video games e.t.c. This will be the foundation upon which my humble blog will be built, and that is reviews. I won't set any strict date for new reviews as the unpredictability of secondary education has somewhat crippled my ability of foresight beyond what I can currently repair, and as a result of this I can't really stick to any deadlines. Now, there are many things I cannot guarantee but here are some things that I can. I will not be biased (a media text is a media text, regardless of who made it) and I will not water down my opinions. For example, if I believe one film to be the complete embodiment of cinematic perfection, I'll tell you, and if I believe a film to be the epitome of my dread and sufffering in a motion picture format, I will also tell you. One other thing is that I will, as much as it pains me to say, watch films and play games that I would normally not even allow into my home for the benefit of my currently non existent fanbase. So whether you're just an innocent, internet dwelling member of the general public looking for something to read, or just a fan of media who is looking for a critic who may appeal to them, I will try my best to please you all.

Do svidanya
-Jamie

If you have any queries/opportunities, please contact me at www.facebook.com/blackwatcherreviews.

Tuesday, 25 June 2013

'Man of Steel' (2013) Film Review

Dir. By Zack Snyder
Starring Henry Cavill and Michael Shannon

I am a huge DC Comics fan. Of that I cannot deny. Naturally, upon hearing of the existence of a new Superman film that was being produced by the genius behind the hugely successful Dark Knight trilogy, Christopher Nolan, I couldn’t help but feel somewhat overwhelmed by my beaming hope for a good Superman film. This hope was met with a positive, albeit slightly disappointing take on the world’s greatest purveyor of “Truth, justice and the American way.”

What struck me from the beginning of Man of Steel was the sheer beauty of the film’s visuals that jump right out of the screen (surprisingly well assisted by what I normally viewed as the gimmick of 3D cinematography), as the camera pans chaotically across the scene of two rivalling Kryptonian factions at war, all guns blazing in front of an orange sky the likes of which even Bespin’s Cloud City couldn’t rival. The sense of scale that this powerful first act conveyed through not only the stunning work of the visual effects department, but also through the intricacies of the character's costumes (in particular the battle armour of Russell Crowe’s and Michael Shannon’s Jor-El and General Zod respectively) and the instantly recognisable musical mastery of Hans Zimmer’s epic score (quite possibly my favourite element of the entire film) was quite spectacular to say the least.

Sadly however, this level of majesty was just too much for quite a large section of the rest of the film to compete with. Although the origins of the character were well illustrated through a number of cleverly placed flashback sequences, featuring the surprisingly powerful work of Kevin Costner as Jonathan Kent, I was left with the feeling that some of these sequences were included to indulge in the filmmakers big named assets as much as possible. These sequences, along with numerous others, all contributed to constructing a film of a length that was simply far too long for what it had to offer. Had it not been for the fantastic cast that were involved in the film, I feel my patience would have been thinned far further than it was in the end.

The cast were one the best parts of Man of Steel, with not a single actor missing a trick in their performances, with one of my favourite being Laurence Fishburne playing the editor of the Daily Planet newspaper. It is in this area that MOS excels. Crowe delivers a solid performance as Jor-El, Cavill’s on-screen ‘real’ father from Krypton, managing to work well in scenes with the young actor whose performance as Superman was a pleasant surprise for me, whilst also managing to make the first act of the film as good as it is as he checks off nearly every box in the Sci-Fi checklist in a matter of about 20 minutes. However, I feel that the actor who shined most out of the entire cast has to be Michael Shannon. His performance as Zod not only captured the character's violent demeanor perfectly, but also allowed for some of the film’s best exchanges of dialogue. His intelligent voice and dominating face made for a performance that I feel is one of the best recent super villain performances around.

The final act is, despite the shortcomings of the films previous sections (minus the first 20), fantastic. The fight scenes are fantastically choreographed with plenty of flying punches and decimated buildings courtesy of every character wearing spandex or battle armour. The CGI does become somewhat tedious at times, but due to the nature of the character it can be ignored as being somewhat necessary, if not slightly self-indulgent on Snyder’s part. It also covers one of the most important parts of the Superman mythos of all time, including a cry of pain that is synonymous with Superman’s past. I’ll let you find that one out yourself. During this final act, you can’t help but ignore the film’s flaws and just sit back and let the über destruction and super punches unfold in front of you.

Verdict:
Man of Steel is what it is. Whilst not quite the Batman Begins that everyone hoped for, it still stands tall on its two spandex clad ham hock legs and manages to stake a successful claim to a position within the league of successful superhero films, which is more than can be said for its other DC counterpart,  Green Lantern. Although not the best superhero film, it could well be the best Superman film. It certainly makes a Man of Steel 2 seem like a very probable and very exciting prospect.

Score:
7 out of 10


-Jamie

Copyright Jamie King 2013, All Rights Reserved, permissions may be granted by request.

'Rugby World Cup 2011' (2011) Game Review

Over the years, the game of Rugby union has been largely underrepresented in the world of video games. With EAs support for Rugby union being withdrawn after its final entry in 2007 which many believed to be the last of what were a fun, yet somewhat incomplete series of games. For the next 4 years, Rugby gamers were left in limbo, desiring a next gen game that could successfully remake their favourite sport of Rugby union. Then, in August 2011, a certain game was released under the guise of 'Rugby World Cup 2011'. I bought the game. I enjoyed the game. I completed the game. I then began to wish that I hadn't bought the game. I had spent 40 quid on a game with about as much replay value as a burst sheet of bubble wrap. At the end of the day, there's only so many times you can lift the Webb Ellis cup with your monstrously rendered and horribly modelled virtual national team (only half of the 20 teams included actually being officially licensed) before their robotic running and nightmarish faces become a bit stale.

This supposed high definition revamp of developer HB Studio’s previous rugby title, Rugby 08, falls so short of its sports gaming rivals, such as the fun but flawed Jonah Lomu Rugby Challenge and the long running football franchise FIFA, that you wouldn’t be wrong to mistake the title with that of a last generation game. The game’s graphics have only marginally improved upon the aforementioned Rugby 08 (ironically the last rugby game ever published by sports gaming powerhouse EA Sports), making it look tired and weak when compared to its competition. The sound of the game also reflects upon the lack of graphical quality, with all 6 commentators sounding apathetic, much like the crowd.

However, as most gamers now know, the most important aspects of any game are its features and its gameplay. It is in these departments that the game disappoints the most.

Instead of retaining all of Rugby 08’s modes, that included the Tri Nations, English Premiership and southern hemisphere Super 15 Rugby, RWC instead opted for a stripped down version of its predecessor with only five gameplay modes, Rugby World Cup campaign, single tests (only international), warm up tour (choose a team and play a tour of the opposite hemisphere as said team), a fun albeit miniscule pace kick shootout mode (clearly designed for semi-drunken competitions between friends) and finally a 2 player only online multiplayer mode (despite local multiplayer allowing for 4 players). Not only is the multiplayer restricted in its player numbers, but the net-code for the game is also truly awful, making for many a frustrating mistake as a result of a near unresponsive team when playing online (that is if you can even find another player online). The gameplay itself, for what it’s worth, is acceptable for someone looking to play a very simplified version of the game, with the base operations being mapped out well on the controller (passing with the shoulder buttons, kicks mapped on the face buttons). However, this simplicity can become quite irritating at times especially during rucks in which a button mash approach is taken, with a fairly repetitive cycle of sprint-pass-sprint-pass dominating the majority of offensive play, made more mundane by the weak AI that fails to offer too much of a challenge even at the highest difficulty level. As a result of this, many gameplay features such as the scrums and lineouts feel like more of an annoyance than a challenge, especially when playing as a less skilled team such as Namibia, where knock-ons and passes straight into touch are an all too common occurrence.

In terms of the game’s longevity, most of it exists in its local multiplayer mode where, despite all its flaws, the simple fun of the game comes out most prominently, as you get a glimpse of what HB Studios were trying to achieve. Alas, their attempt was simply not enough to lift their repackaged, stripped down version of Rugby 08 out of the bargain bin.


Verdict:
Rugby World Cup 2011 promises more, but in the end gives far less than hoped. The one thing that sums up the state of RWC is quite possibly its most ironic flaw. Not even the host nation of the tournament that the game is built upon was willing to give up its license to this title. I recommend only picking this title up for more than £7 if you are a major international Rugby fan who can’t find a copy of the far superior Jonah Lomu Rugby Challenge. Otherwise, skip it altogether, and go for the better title.

Score:
4/5 out of 10

 -Jamie

Copyright Jamie King 2013, All Rights Reserved, permissions may be granted by request.